Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants are nationals of Ghana and are brothers. They were born on 28 th October 1997 and 1 st March 2007 respectively.
They appealed against the decisions of the respondent refusing their applications made on 6 th February 2013 for entry clearance to settle in the UK as the dependent children of their mother. The applications were refused pursuant to paragraph 297 of the rules. The respondent was not satisfied that the relationship between the appellants and their sponsor had been established. Nor was it accepted that she has had sole responsibility. Their appeals to the First-tier Tribunal were dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge in a determination promulgated on 7 th July 2014.
He was not satisfied that the sponsor was the biological mother of the appellants from the evidence submitted [43].
Further, he found the evidence of the sponsor �exercising sole responsibility over the appellants� to be scant [44]. He was however satisfied that the requirements relating to maintenance and accommodation had been met.
Their appeals were dismissed under the Immigration Rules as well as on human rights grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.