Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Unless and until this appeal is finally determined or the court/tribunal directs otherwise the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant is a citizen of Iran. He appeals the decision of Judge Peer of the First-tier Tribunal (the judge) made on 26 September 2023 dismissing his appeal against the respondent's refusal of his international protection and human rights claims.
             The judge found that neither the appellant nor his father had come to the attention of the authorities for reasons of his activity carried out while in Iran. The judge found that the appellant's account of his father being injured during the border crossing was consistent with regular border enforcement activity, but that there was no basis for finding that his father was specifically targeted because of his KDPI activities.
             The judge accepted that the appellant had not been in contact with family members since his arrival in the United Kingdom, but found that there was no reason he could not make contact with them in the future if he returned to Iran, or by making efforts to contact them with the assistance of organisations such as the Red Cross.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.