Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
As these proceedings impact upon the status and welfare of children, I make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the appellants against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Pears promulgated on 7 th August 2014, whereby the judge dismissed the appellants� appeals against the decisions of the respondent dated the 14 and 15 January 2013 to refuse the appellants entry clearance to the United Kingdom under paragraph 297 of the Immigration Rules and under the Article 8 of the ECHR..
By decision made on 8 th of October 2014 permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted. The case appears before me to determine in the first instance whether or not there was a material error of law in the original determination.
The first appellant was born in 1996 and the second appellant in 1998. They live in Kabul. The father of the appellants died on 8 September 2009 and their mother died on the 3 May 2012.
The appellants have an older brother in the United Kingdom, who is seeking to sponsor their entry to the United Kingdom. It is the appellants� case that the sponsor has been sending money to Afghanistan in an effort to support the appellants. The appellants being minors are presently living with family friends, described as a child care family.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.