Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This matter comes before me for consideration as to whether or not the determination discloses a material error of law. In a determination before First-tier Tribunal (Judge K E Gordon) promulgated on 16 June 2014, she dismissed the appellant�s appeal on the papers.
The appellant and his wife Tasneem Zehra Zaidi are husband and wife and are nationals of Pakistan.
The respondent refused the appellant�s application for leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 2 (General) Migrant. The grounds for refusal were that the certificate of sponsorship stated that the prospective employment most closely corresponding to occupation code 7220 was not on the list of NQF level 6 occupations and accordingly the appellant did not qualify for the relevant points under Appendix A.
In a determination the Tribunal observed at [3] that the notice of appeal stated that the appellant�s employer made an error in providing the code and had since provided an explanation for that error. There was no further evidence before the Tribunal to show that the certificate of sponsorship was incorrect and/or any explanation of any error.
Ground 1 � the Tribunal erred by failing to consider documents and a statement from the appellant�s employer filed with the notice of appeal and which the Tribunal did not have before it.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.