Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  Having found an error of law in Judge Atkin's decision, the Tribunal set that aside and gave directions for a resumed hearing before this Tribunal. No findings were preserved.
                  I heard evidence via a Punjabi interpreter from the Appellant's daughter, Alka Saini. She and her husband, Harpreet Singh are the Appellant's sponsors.
                  Having heard that evidence and submissions from both parties, I reserved my decision and indicated that I would provide that in writing which I now turn to do.
                  The Appellant's application was made under the EU (Family Permit) appendix to the Immigration Rules ("Appendix EU (FP)"). She claims to be the dependent parent of her daughter. Appendix EU (FP) defines a dependent parent as follows (so far as relevant):
"Dependent parent (a) the direct relative in the ascending line of a relevant EEA citizen ... or of their spouse...; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.