Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Nicholas Le Poidevin (instructed by Brabners Chaffe Street, of Liverpool) for the Claimants. The First Defendant appeared in person. Mr Mark Hubbard (instructed by Paris Smith & Randall LLP, of Southampton) for the Third to Seventh Defendants Hearing dates: 15th, 16th November 2005 ____________________
That power was then subject to restrictions in the case of the Secondary Beneficiaries which can be ignored for present purposes.
(2) subject thereto the trustees had a power of appointment in favour of the Discretionary Beneficiaries in similar terms to that contained in the settlement and
(3) subject thereto a discretionary trust of income in favour of the Discretionary Beneficiaries with a power to accumulate during minorities.
That exhibit shows that from those policies A and B can each expect about �130,000 in 2007, and C some �77,000.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.