Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Steven Woolf (instructed by Ashley Bean & Co) for the Claimant Neil Levy (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna) for the Defendant Hearing dates : 23 June 2004 ____________________
The reference to section 63 is to that section of the Law of Property Act 1925, whereby every conveyance is effectual to pass whatever estate or interest a conveying party has in the property expressed or intended to be conveyed.
There are observations to a similar effect in the Achampong case. In The Mortgage Corporation v Shaire Neuberger J left it to the parties to try to agree terms between themselves, but he made it clear that, if Mrs Shaire would not agree to something which gave the bank a realistic prospect of recovering at least some of its money, he would simply make an order for sale.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.