Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant before us is the Secretary of State for the Home Department who appeals against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 8 December 2014. The Secretary of State for the Home Department is hereinafter referred as �the Secretary of State�. The respondents are hereinafter referred to as �the applicants�. By the decision of the First-tier Tribunal the applicants� appeal of the Secretary of State�s decision dated 26 March 2014 to refuse their applications for further leave to remain as Tier 1 Entrepreneurs was allowed.
The applicants are nationals of Pakistan. The first applicant was born on 10 December 1984, the second applicant was born on 8 June 1984, the third applicant is the second applicant�s wife and his dependant.
The first and second applicants were called to an interview by the Secretary of State. They attended that interview on 20 February 2014. They were interviewed separately.
The applications of 14 March 2013 were refused by the Secretary of State on 24 March 2014, which generated a right of appeal pursuant to Section 82(1)(d) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (�the 2002 Act�).
The applicants exercised their right of appeal. The hearing came before the First-tier Tribunal on 8 December 2014. In the course of that appeal hearing the first and second applicants gave oral evidence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.