Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Jarvis helpfully referred us to r. 17 (1) (a) of the Upper Tribunal Procedure Rules, and to SM (withdrawal of appealed decision: effect) (Pakistan) [2014] UKUT 64 (IAC) . The relevant part of r. 17 follows: since it is now (as in force from 21 August 2015) in rather different terms from those considered in SM , it will be enough for us to set these out.
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a party may give notice of the withdrawal of its case, or any part of it�
(a) by sending or delivering to the Upper Tribunal a written notice of withdrawal; or
(2) Notice of withdrawal will not take effect unless the Upper Tribunal consents to the withdrawal except in relation to an application for permission to appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.