Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 28 February 2001 Before
The Appellant was at the time a Principal Trading Standards Officer with the Respondent, the London Borough of Camden. We take the view that it is arguable given the complexity of the case that that was not the right decision to reach in the circumstances.
We find it difficult to follow what the Tribunal was there saying. We find it difficult to see why this would explain the distinction. Nor do we find the words
to be clear. We stress that this a very small part of the case. As it evolved it became only one of alleged racial discrimination but nonetheless, we take the view that it is arguable.
The thrust of the findings by the Tribunal was that there was such subsequent falsification. The Appellant writes:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.