Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              This is an appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Joshi ("the Judge") dated 31 May 2023 in which the Judge refused the appeal of Mr Jamil Bokth against the Secretary of State for the Home Department ("SSHD") in relation to his application under private and family life on the basis that the appellant had been in the United Kingdom for twenty years.
              The appellant appeals with permission of the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Joshi.
              The central feature of this case is whether or not the appellant had been in the United Kingdom for twenty years and therefore satisfied the requirements under paragraph 276ADE(1)(iii).
              Ground 1 is that the judge made an error of law by using an adverse credibility finding against the appellant in order to tarnish the further witness evidence before the judge. Mr Karim in his helpful submissions has explained that that error is fundamental to the case and as a result there is an error of law.
              The judge deals with the further witnesses which are said to support the appellant's position at paragraph 52 of the judgment. The judge says:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.