Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
J. Wardell, Q.C. (instructed by Withers LLP) for the Appellants P. Marshall, Q.C. and Ms H Brown (instructed by Howrey Simon Arnold & White Solicitors) for the Respondents ____________________
The sum of �615,880 be paid into court, for or on behalf of the 10 th and 38 th Defendants, by way of security for the Claimants' costs of the appeal.
The following sums be paid into court, within 21 days, for or on behalf of the 10 th and 13 th Defendants:
The sum of �1m be paid to the Claimants' for or on behalf of the 10 th and 38 th Defendants in respect of past assessed costs.
The dispute concerns the amount to be paid. Mr Marshall has provided details of the estimate of the costs that his clients will incur in the appeal amounting to �615,880 and submits that that sum or thereabouts should be paid into court. Mr Wardell submits that the sum should be �300,000.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.