Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This appellant was granted permission to appeal the decision of the First-tier Tribunal as follows:
The individual points on which the decision of the judge who permission in the First-tier Tribunal are seriously challenged both concern the hearing judge�s findings at paragraphs 20 - 24. The order of events put forward or accepted on behalf of the appellant is as follows:
March appellant and sponsor form relationship: appellant goes on to overstay his visa
The judge did not believe the account the appellant and the sponsor had given of their history, and so dismissed the appeal. The specific points on which the judge�s findings are challenged (as opposed to the appellant�s case simply being re-asserted) are these:
(a) the sponsor married H1 in January, not June 2006 (as the judge said at paragraph 5); and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.