Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant is a national of Egypt who claimed asylum on 24 October 2019. The basis of his claim was that he was involved in a blood feud with the family of his sister's (now deceased) fiancé. The Respondent refused his claim by decision dated 14 June 2023 and the appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal ("FTT"). In a decision dated 10 February 2024, the FTT dismissed his appeal. The appellant now therefore appeals against the FTT's decision with permission to the Upper Tribunal.
             The hearing before me took place via MS Teams. There were occasions when Mr Mohzam's and Mr Bates' connections froze. However, it was clear to me when this occurred and, once Mr Mohzam and Mr Bates respectively disconnected and reconnected to the call, it was possible to carry on and I am satisfied that each party was able to make all the submissions they wished to.
             The FTT's decision sets out the background at [3]-[15]. It is unnecessary to go into the detail of this for present purposes, but it is necessary to note that the Judge noted at [3] that the appellant was born on 1 August 1999.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.