Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) PENSIONS Decided on the papers Decision Given On: 19 December 2025 B e f o r e :
This was an inadvertent oversight rather than wilful ignorance or gross misconduct, and as also mentioned, we have implemented rigorous mail handling procedures to ensure it does not occur again. However, striking out our appeal based on a single honest mistake would severely harm our firm ."
We are more than willing to furnish signed affidavits from all fellow office tenants verifying the initial notice's errant delivery ."
As a consequence from that determination, pursuant to rule 8(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009, the First-tier Tribunal "must strike out the whole or part of the proceedings if the Tribunal does not (a) have jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings or that part of them�". These proceedings are therefore struck out.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.