Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mrs Majlinda Sykaj Master Sedjan Sykaj Master Aravis Sykaj Master Melison Sykaj no anonymity directions made
For the sake of convenience I shall refer to the appellant as the secretary of state and the respondents as �the claimants.�
They originally appealed against the decision of the secretary of state refusing their applications for further leave to remain in the UK pursuant to the Immigration Rules, Appendix FM EX.1.
The reasons for refusal letter took into account that the three children, then aged 12, 10 and 7, had lived in the UK for seven years. They were however not British citizens. It was accordingly considered reasonable to expect them to be removed to Albania as a family unit.
The First-tier Tribunal Judge had no sympathy for the first claimant, the mother. He referred to her previous history as a concerted and contrived effort to defeat the immigration controls of a country by a determined effort to remain here even after she had once been removed. To enable such a person to remain here, even in the face of Article 8 considerations, would require much more than simply the routine reference to Article 8 interests [15].
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.