Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 17 February 1999 Before
MR JUSTICE CHARLES : The parties to this appeal are Miss S. Quashie and the London Borough of Greenwich. Miss Quashie appeals against the decision of an Industrial Tribunal sitting at London (South). They sat over a considerable period of time and gave Extended Reasons dated 14 August 1998 which run to 24 pages. The decision was a majority decision.
A skeleton argument was produced by Miss Quashie which we were told today was drafted by Solicitors. That identifies points which are said to be points of law that are reasonably arguable.
We will take only one of them for present purposes and that is that the conclusion of the majority relating to estoppel, which can be found in paragraph 68 and following of the Extended Reasons, is wrong. We accept that there are reasonably arguable points of law that that conclusion was wrong.
Assuming also (and at this stage it is simply an assumption) that the other points identified in the skeleton argument give rise to points of law that are reasonably arguable, the issue that remains is whether or not they are purely academic.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.