Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
On 11 th December 2013 Mr Parvez, the Appellant, the Appellant�s wife and M made further applications for residence cards on the same basis that is that Mr Parvez was an EEA national exercising treaty rights and the others were his dependents. Mr Parvez�s application and that of Ms Khalid and M were all granted and they were issued with residence cards expiring in 2019.
The Respondent pointed to a number of what were termed significant discrepancies:
(i) The Appellant had submitted a handful of British Gas bills dated between April and October 2013 that named the Appellant as one of the recipients. These did not confirm any kind of relationship and at most indicated he was a housemate.
(ii) Although M was said to have been born in 2009 M�s birth certificate was dated 13 th March 2013 which indicated a possibility that the certificate may have been reprinted and issued with additional information.
(iii) The Appellant had made a previous asylum application in July 2010 but on that occasion he had failed to mention having any dependants here in the United Kingdom nor had he made any reference to a family life.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.