Maxamcorp International Sl v Eurotel LLC

MR. PAUL KEY KC and MR. NATHAN TWIBILL (instructed by LK Law LLP) appeared on behalf of the Claimant The Defendant did not appear and was not represented ____________________

(a) permits Maxam to serve Eurotel out of the jurisdiction and by an alternative method, namely by emails on the lawyers who at the time of that application represented Eurotel in the proceedings which it has commenced against Maxam in the Voronezh Arbitrazh Court in Russia (Case No. A 14-17859/2024 ("the Russian Proceedings");

(b) restrains Eurotel were pursuing the Russian proceedings or any other proceedings otherwise than in accordance with the terms of certain arbitration agreements ("the Arbitration Agreements"). These arbitration agreements were contained in or incorporated into certain supply agreements ("the Supply Agreements"); and

(c) restrains Eurotel from enforcing any judgment rendered against Maxam in the Russian Proceedings.

(1) First, to clarify that the interim anti-enforcement injunction applies specifically to the 4 March 2026 Russian Judgment.