Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant, Mr Ghulam Raza, date of birth 5 th May 1984, is a citizen of Pakistan. I have considered whether or not is it appropriate to make an anonymity direction. Taking all the circumstances into account I do not make such a direction.
There was no attendance by the Appellant. His representatives had by fax/e-mail written to the Tribunal on the 23 rd February 2015 stating that they were without instructions. They were applying to be taken off the record and stated that they would not be attending. There was no explanation for the non-attendance of the Appellant.
The Notice of Hearing had gone out to the Appellant in accordance with the Rules. I decided in the circumstances it was just and proper to proceed with the hearing in the Appellant�s absence.
The Appellant is appealing against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Cockrill promulgated on 7 th November 2014. By that determination Judge Cockrill dismissed the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the Respondent to refuse the Appellant a residence card as evidence of a right to reside as the spouse of an EEA national exercising treaty rights in the United Kingdom.
On 25 th May 2012 the Appellant had applied for and was subsequently granted leave to remain as a Tier 4 (General) Student. Leave was granted on 10 th August 2012. However, by 12 th February 2013 that leave was revoked.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.