Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr S J Joseph, Counsel instructed by Chambers of Sel Job Joseph
The Appellant, a national of Sri Lanka, date of birth 7 June 1948, appealed against the Respondent�s decision, dated 13 June 2013, to refuse an application for a residence card made on 12 May 2014.
The decision of 11 June 2014 in the event came down solely to the issue of appropriate evidence of dependency between the Appellant and Sponsor, Mr Roy Mendis.
The matter came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Fox who, on 21 August 2014, dismissed the appeal under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (the 2006 Regulations) with reference to the fact that the Appellant had failed to discharge the burden of proof upon a balance of probabilities of the claimed dependency and also with reference to the claimed domestic arrangements between the Appellant and the Sponsor.
�7. The Appellant has failed to satisfy the burden upon her. There appears to be no dispute that the Appellant falls within the qualifying relationship of Regulation 7 of the EEA Regulations. The issue is of the claimed dependency and the place of residence.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.