Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  The appellant appeals a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Hillis ('the Judge') dismissing his appeal under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016.
                  The appellant is a national of Pakistan and aged 25. His sponsor is his paternal uncle, a national of Spain, who enjoys limited leave to remain in the United Kingdom under the EU Settlement Scheme. The sponsor is self-employed.
                  The appellant applied for an EEA Family Permit in August 2020. The respondent refused the application by a decision dated 20 October 2020 reasoning, inter alia :
"On your application you state that your sponsor has resided in the UK since 05 May 2020 and that you are financially dependent on him. As evidence of this you have provided money transfer remittance receipts from your sponsor to you. However, I would expect to see evidence which fully details yours and your family's circumstances. Your income, expenditure and evidence of your financial position which would prove that without the financial support of your sponsor your essential living needs could not be met.
I therefore refuse your EEA Family Permit application because I am not satisfied that you meet all of the requirements of regulation 12 (see ECGs EUN2.23) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.