Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 9 November 2001 Before
As I understand it, Mr Zaman's case is that he was not promoted as fast as he should have been and that the reason for that was racial discrimination but he also relies upon a series of incidents, presumably of a racial character, in support of that basic allegation.
And they point out also that Mr Zaman's Counsel would not be able to cross-examine him, because he would not be there, and they ask for the matter to be treated as a matter of urgency.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.