Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellants are citizens of Iran who applied on 12 March 2013 for entry clearance for settlement as the spouse and son of the sponsor, who had been granted humanitarian protection in the UK.
By separate decisions made on 22 May 2013 the Respondent refused those applications by reference to paragraphs 352A (iii) and 352D (iii) of the Immigration Rules. He was not satisfied that the sponsor and the First Appellant were free to marry one another at the date of the marriage relied upon, alternatively that the marriage of the sponsor and the First Appellant was subsisting at the date the sponsor had fled Iran.
The Appellants lodged an appeal with the First Tier Tribunal against those decisions, and as a result the decisions were the subject of review by the ECM on 7 January 2014. The ECM upheld the decision.
The Respondent applied to the First Tier Tribunal for permission to appeal on two grounds, and permission was granted by Judge Plumptre on 9 May 2014.
The Appellants filed no Rule 24 Notice and neither party made a Rule 15(2A) application to introduce further evidence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.