Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant : Ms N Wilcocks-Briscoe, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent : Mr P Turner, counsel, instructed by Greater London Solicitors
I shall refer to the appellant as "the entry clearance officer" and to the respondent as "the claimant."
The entry clearance officer appeals with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal Judge promulgated on 25 September 2015, allowing the claimant's appeal against the decision of the entry clearance officer dated 21 August 2014 refusing his application for leave to enter the UK as a partner under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules.
In refusing the claimant's application for entry clearance as a partner under Appendix FM of the Rules, the entry clearance officer asserted in respect of the financial requirements that had to be met, that his sponsor provided evidence showing that she is employed as a teaching assistant and meal supervisor at a school earning a total salary of £15,842.15 a year which is lower than the minimum income threshold required, namely £18,600 per year.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.