Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is the appellants' appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Asjad promulgated 5.5.15, dismissing their linked appeals against the decisions of the Secretary of State, dated 23.5.14, to refuse their applications for leave to remain in the UK on the basis of private and family life. The Judge heard the appeal on 13.4.15.
First-tier Tribunal Judge Fisher refused permission to appeal on 8.10.15. However, when the application was renewed to the Upper Tribunal, Upper Tribunal Judge Eshun granted permission to appeal on 10.11.15.
For the reasons set out below, I found such error of law in the making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal as to require decision of Judge Asjad to be set aside and remade by remitting the decision in the appeals to the First-tier Tribunal in accordance with the attached directions.
In essence, the grounds of application for permission to appeal argue that (1) the First-tier Tribunal Judge formed a negative view of the first appellant's credibility at �8 before considering all the other evidence in the case, including the expert evidence; and (2) that the judge failed to give adequate consideration to that expert evidence.
In granting permission to appeal, Judge Eshun considered that all the grounds disclose an arguable error of law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.