Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  The appellant, a citizen of Sudan born on 6 June 1978, appeals with permission a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Thapar ('the Judge') promulgated on the 1 July 2021 following a hearing at Birmingham IAC on 28 June 2021.
                  The Judge records the appellant's immigration history at [1 - 2] of the determination in the following terms:
               The Appellant appeals the refusal of 29 September 2020 pursuant to section 82(1)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ("the 2002 Act").
                  The Judge records having heard oral evidence from the appellant and one witness in addition to the documentary evidence. The Judge specifically states that appropriate care and time were taken to ensure that all relevant documents were before the First-tier Tribunal. I find from reading the determination and the supportive evidence that it is clear that the Judge considered that evidence with the required degree of anxious scrutiny.
                  The Judge sets out the correct legal self-direction concerning the burden of standard approved between [9 - 11]. Having read the determination in detail I do not find it made out that despite having set out the correct applicable legal test the Judge failed to apply it.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.