Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant appealed against a decision of Judge Stott of the First-tier Tribunal (the FtT) promulgated on 30 th September 2014.
The Appellant is a female citizen of Botswana born 2 nd October 1997 who entered the United Kingdom on 7 th February 2011 as a visitor. She was granted leave to enter for six months.
Prior to expiry of that leave, on 4 th July 2011 the Appellant applied for settlement in the United Kingdom, claiming that she wished to remain in this country with her mother Edith Rampana to whom I shall refer as the Sponsor.
The Respondent refused that application on the basis that DNA evidence proved that the Sponsor is not the Appellant's mother but is her aunt. The Respondent's mother Lady Judith Rampana was living in Botswana.
However the Appellant was granted further discretionary leave to remain outside the Immigration Rules, on 11 th October 2012, valid until 11 th April 2013. The purpose of this leave was to enable her to make arrangements to return to Botswana.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.