Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The judgment is being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them (and other persons identified by name in the judgment itself may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved.
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MUNBY In the matter of the Children Act 1989 And in the matter of C ____________________
Mr James Tillyard QC (instructed by the Head of Legal Services) for the applicant (the local authority). Mr Michael Keehan QC and Ms Ruth Henkefor (instructed by the Avery Naylor (Swansea)) for the first respondent (the mother). Mr Mark Allen (instructed by the Graham Evans & Partners (Swansea)) for the second and third respondents (the maternal grandmother and step-grandfather). Mr David Crowley (instructed by the Howe & Spender (Swansea)) for the fourth respondent (the child). The child's father was neither present nor represented. ____________________
She therefore accepts that on the current medical evidence, and on the balance of probabilities:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.