Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(A)������ The claimant�s claim of age discrimination is not well-founded and accordingly it is dismissed.
(B)������ The claimant�s claim of unfair dismissal is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of �9,965.
The claimant was represented by Mr M Potter, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Norman Shannon and Co Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr S Cheeves, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Machins Solicitors LLP.
1.�������� �Renault Trucks NI� is merely a trade name.� Therefore, in this Decision, we refer to Renault Trucks UK Ltd as �the Respondent�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.