Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This is my decision which I have delivered orally at the hearing. The background to the substantive matter relates to a protection claim. For that reason, it is appropriate to make an anonymity order.
              The background to the protection claim is that the Appellant contends that he would be at risk on return to Bangladesh because of his activities in support of the Bangladesh National Party (BNP).
              The matter had come for hearing before First-tier Tribunal Judge Coll ("the judge) sitting at a hybrid hearing at the Taylor House Tribunal Centre on 16 May 2022. The judge had considered the Appellant's claims and had concluded that:
(1)            It was not reasonably likely that the Appellant was a member of the BNP in Bangladesh or in the UK;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.