Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The decision of the Newcastle-upon-Tyne First-tier Tribunal dated 30 July 2012 under file reference SC229 /12/00036 involves an error on a point of law and is set aside.�
The (First) Respondent�s decision dated 28 January 2011 (as revised on 17 May 2011 and 21 June 2011) that the Appellant is not entitled to Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) for the period from 6 April 1986 to 5 April 2005 is set aside.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Tribunal notes the Respondent�s concession that the Appellant is entitled to HRP from 6 April 1984 to 5 April 1986.
The Appellant is not entitled to HRP for the period from 6 April 1990 because (as matters currently stand) those subsequent tax years are all already qualifying years for purposes of calculating entitlement to state retirement pension by virtue of the payment of Class 1, Class 3 or a mixture of Class 1 and Class 3 National Insurance contributions in respect of each relevant tax year.�
This decision is given under section 12(2)(a) and 12(2)(b)(ii) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.