Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this appeal the Appellant is the Secretary of State for the Home Department and the Respondent is Mrs Jaspreet Kaur a citizen of India born 18 th July 1989. For ease of reference however I shall refer to the Secretary of State as �the Respondent� and Mrs Kaur as �the Appellant�.
This is the review of an appeal brought against the Entry Clearance Officer New Delhi, to refuse the Appellant entry clearance to the United Kingdom as a spouse to join her husband �the Sponsor� who is a British citizen settled here.
The Appellant made application on 7 th August 2012 to join her husband as his spouse. It is accepted that she and her husband are validly married and at the date of decision which is 1 st November 2012, there were no dependant children born of the union.
The ECO refused the application because he was not satisfied that the Appellant met the requirements of Appendix FM-SE (Financial Requirements) of the new Immigration Rules. In order to meet the financial requirements the Appellant needed to show that her Sponsor had a gross income of �18,600 per annum and that he had been in receipt of this amount for at least six months.
The ECO was satisfied that the Sponsor was holding down two jobs which brought in a gross income of at least �18,600; but he had not demonstrated that this had been the situation for six months. He therefore refused the Appellant�s application.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.