Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              This is an appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Karbani promulgated on 10 August 2022 allowing the appeal of Elson Hanko against a decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department dated 6 December 2021.
              Although before us the Secretary of State for the Home Department is the Appellant and Mr Hanko is the Respondent, for the sake of consistency with the proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal we shall hereafter refer to the Secretary of State as the Respondent and Mr Hanko as the Appellant.
              The application was refused by the Respondent on 6 December 2021 for reasons set out in a decision letter of that date: in summary, the Appellant had failed to provide requisite evidence in the form of a valid family permit or residence card issued under the EEA Regulations.
              The basis upon which the Appellant pursued his appeal before the First-tier Tribunal is summarised at paragraph 8 of the Decision of Judge Karbani:
              The appeal was heard on 3 August 2022. It appears that neither representative raised, and the Judge was otherwise unaware of, the decision in Batool and others (other family members: EU exit) [2022] UKUT 219 (IAC) , which had been promulgated on 19 July 2022.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.