Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Hon. RICHARD TODD KC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) ____________________
MR CHARLES HOWARD KC and MR ALEX TATTON-BENNETT (instructed by Melius Family Law) for the Applicant MR MICHAEL HORTON KC and MS RACHEL COOPER (instructed by LCF Law Solicitors) for the Respondent ____________________
"Finally, the applicant has stated that the companies were established with contributions from both parties."
This is in their Working Paper. It contemplates ultimately leaving matters to the Court; a "trust the Judges" attitude which has been so patently successful in the similarly discretionary jurisdiction found in Part II of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. They continue:
"(6) The High Court should have jurisdiction to entertain applications in the following circumstances:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.