Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Martin Pointer QC and Mr Nicholas Yates (instructed by Hunters) for the Applicant Mr Lewis Marks QC & Mr Simon Webster (instructed by Boodle Hatfield) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 23, 24, 25, 26 April 2013 ____________________
i) Who should keep Falkirk Castle, Dunfermline, a small 16 th century Scottish castle about 30 minutes drive from Edinburgh Airport. Both parties want it;
ii) How should the "co-investment" and "carried interest" elements of the husband's interests in three private equity funds in which he is heavily involved be shared. There is a significant difference between the parties which may involve many millions of pounds;
iii) The value to be attributed to the sailing yacht Nibali which it is agreed the husband will keep. The parties are about �600,000 apart;
iv) Whether lesser assets including some cars should be included in the precise calculation of the division. The wife says they should, the husband that they are de minimis in the context of this case;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.