Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HAVING considered all documents filed at the Upper Tribunal and having heard Mr Fripp of counsel for the applicant and Mr Hoar of counsel for the respondent at a hearing on 14-15 June 2022 at Field House, London
    There shall be a declaration that the Applicant's date of birth is 1 November 2004.
    The parties may parties may, no later than 14 days after this judgment is handed down, file and serve written submissions as regards costs. There shall, in any event, be a detailed assessment of the applicant's publicly funded costs.
Sent / Handed to the applicant, respondent and any interested party / the applicant's, respondent's and any interested party's solicitors on (date): 6 July 2022
A decision by the Upper Tribunal on an application for judicial review is a decision that disposes of proceedings.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.