Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
STEPHEN BROACH and CIAR McANDREW (instructed by Anthony Gold Solicitors ) for the Claimant DEOK- JOO RHEE QC and TOM TABORI (instructed by London Borough of Redbridge) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 23/01/2019 - 24/01/2019 ____________________
(1) Grounds 1 and 2. Are the arrangements Wednesbury unlawful; do they entail unacceptable risk that Redbridge will fail to comply with statutory obligations?
(b) The indirect discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010 (sections 6,19, and 29(6)).
(c) The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim under the Equality Act (sections 6, 20, 21 and 29(7), and Schedule 2).
A failure to comply with the section 20 duty is unlawful discrimination: see section 21 of the 2010 Act.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.