Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Judicial Review of a decision by Stirling Council that the petitioner is intentionally homeless; for declarator that Stirling Council is under an obligation to provide permanent accommodation for her, and for an order for specific performance that such permanent accommodation be provided
Introduction [1] By this petition for judicial review the petitioner challenges the decision of Stirling Council (“the respondents”) dated 31 August 2015 (“the decision” or “decision letter” as the context requires), in which the respondents upheld their decision of 2 June 2015 determining that the petitioner was intentionally homeless in terms of section 26(1) of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 (“the 1987 Act”).
[3] The respondents determined by letter dated 2 June that the petitioner had ceased to occupy the property as a consequence of something she had deliberately done or failed to do, and further that it would have been reasonable for her to continue to occupy the property.
[4] That the petitioner sought a review of the said decision in terms of a letter dated 19 June 2015 (6/4 of process).
[5] The material points put forward in said letter in support of the petitioner’s appeal were these:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.