Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Khudail ("the Judge") dated 17 May 2021 dismissing her appeal against the respondent's decision of 13 March 2019 to refuse her human rights claim, made on 02 May 2017.
            The appellant was denied permission to appeal by the First-tier Tribunal in a decision sent on 15 July 2021, and on 3 August 2021, she renewed her application to the Upper Tribunal. Her application to the Upper Tribunal was not decided until 25 January 2024. In the decision granting permission, Upper Tribunal Judge Blundell recorded that it had not been possible to identify the cause of the regrettable delay.
            In response to a request from the Home Office for updating medical evidence in July 2018, the appellant's solicitors wrote that she was suffering from depression and medical complications following the birth of the child.
            On 11 January 2021, there was a case management review hearing. This was followed by email correspondence between the parties in which the respondent refused to consent to the Tribunal's consideration of this new matter, saying that if the appellant feared persecution on return to Bangladesh, she should make an asylum claim.
        The final question to the appellant was put by the Judge:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.