Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              The Appellant appeals, with permission, against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing his appeal against the Respondent's decision refusing to issue him with a decision granting him leave to remain in the UK on grounds of his family and private life.
              I make no anonymity direction, none being requested or required.
              An application for permission to appeal was made by the Appellant which was initially refused by the First-tier Tribunal on 26 th April 2022, which held that there was no confusion on the part of the judge in her interpretation of the FCDO advice in relation to whether there was a distinction between "travel" and "essential travel" in relation to Pakistan. However, permission to appeal was granted by the Upper Tribunal on 20 th September 2022.
              The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error on a point of law. The decision is set aside. The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh, with no findings preserved, pursuant to Section 12(2)(b)(i) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and Practice Statement 7.2(b) before any judge apart from Judge Head.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.