Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1] This case concerns the defender's claim for parental rights and contact in relation to his two daughters, C and H, from his relationship with the pursuer.
[2] I heard evidence over two days from the defender; his wife, SM; the pursuer; and from the pursuer's partner, CG. I also took into account the terms of two Bar Reports prepared by Ms J Higson, Solicitor (Numbers 10 and 17 of Process).
[3] Having heard the evidence and submissions, I found the following facts to be admitted or proved.
[4] Between about May 2003 and September 2006 the parties were in a relationship and lived together. There are two children of that relationship: C (DOB 26th January 2004 ) and H (DOB 4th April 2005 ) ("the children").Since the parties separated, the children have resided with the pursuer.
[5] Since the parties separated, the defender has exercised contact with the children. There have been numerous difficulties connected with the exercise of that contact which have been both caused by and led to conflict between the parties.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.