Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant is a citizen of Venezuela born on 31 st August 1948 and he applied for admission to the United Kingdom as a family member of an EEA national exercising treaty rights in the UK, namely his wife, (the sponsor). On 4 th July 2014 the respondent refused the application with reference to Regulation 7 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (the EEA Regulations) as no passport or evidence of marriage was provided.
The appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Sullivan, who allowed the appeal under the EEA Regulations.
An application for permission to appeal was made by the respondent on the basis that the decision was perverse if not irrational. An error of law was found in a decision promulgated on 1 st June 2015 because of a contradiction within the findings. In order to remake the decision further evidence was requested and I directed that the matter be dealt with on the papers. I have received no objection from the appellant or respondent to the matter being determined on that basis.
Ms Fujiwala indicated at the hearing on 1 st June 2015 that the following documentation would be required:
i) Further translated details of Mrs Wiechers de Mola's pension income from Venezuela.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.