Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(A) The claimant�s holiday pay claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of �1,288 in respect of holiday pay.
(B) The claimant�s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of �720 in respect of notice pay.
(C) The claimant�s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of �843 to the claimant.
The respondent company was represented by Mr S. Ryan, of Ryan Gardiner Associates.
���������� claimants� claims were valid, and effectively did not dispute the amounts���
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.