Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400, Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR R. DRABBLE QC and MR M. WILLERS (instructed by the Community Law Partnership) appeared on behalf of THE CLAIMANTS MR D. ELVIN QC and MR R. TAYLOR (instructed by Basildon District Council) appeared on behalf of THE DEFENDANT ____________________
Compulsory purchase of the site was considered but not seen as a likely beneficial route.
This, said Mr Drabble, showed that it was a case concerning private interests and conflict.
Because there is that distinction, are there further submissions which either of you want to make in relation to the Kinneally position, as a result of what I have decided? I am not seeking submissions that I should change my mind. I am just concerned that as a matter of where the position has been left it is sufficiently clear.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.