Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Christopher Hames QC and James Holmes (instructed by �Eskinazi & Co Solicitors)) for the Applicant Father Henry Setright QC and Jonathan Evans (instructed by Henry Hyams Solicitors) for the Respondent Mother Hearing dates: 7-9 February 2022 ____________________
The father does not deny that he sent this, and other, abusive messages to the mother: "The foul language in some messages was caused by my distress and a sense of helplessness in response to the present situation of separation from my daughter and my wife".
i) that the father had rights of custody ( Article 3 Hague Convention 1980 ) in respect of C in Poland, and that at the time of the removal, he was actually exercising them;
ii) immediately before the time of the removal, C was habitually resident in Poland;
iii) that the removal of C from Poland in September 2020 was wrongful under Article 3 Hague Convention;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.