Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Christopher Morcom QC and Mark Brealey (instructed by Edwin Coe for the Claimants) Christopher Carr QC, Siobhan Ward and Emma Himsworth (instructed by S J Berwin for the Defendant) HEARING DATE: 18/19 JULY 2001 Revised sudgment: 1 October 2001 ____________________
On that basis the Fund dropped its opposition to that US registration. The restriction was very minor, particularly since the Federation did not use WWF in Times Roman.
WHEREAS, the Fund is the world's largest private environmental conservation organization carrying on its activities using the initials WWF as well as providing goods and services under the mark WWF and wishes to avoid any confusion with the trade name "World Wrestling Federation" when abbreviated to the initial "WWF" by Titan;
WHEREAS, the National Affiliates are all signatories to agreements with Fund under which they are each licensed by the Fund to use and sublicense the use of the initials "WWF" in connection with their activities;
WHEREAS, Titan is in the business of providing sports entertainment services and goods and does so under the marks "World Wrestling Federation" and "WWF".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.