Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
      The Appellant appeals against a fixed penalty notice 34845941014 dated 30 th April 2024 on an appeal form dated 17 th May 2024.
      The Respondent sent two letters to the Appellant in May 2023 and October 2023. These communications contained key information to assist the Appellant to comply with its automatic re-enrolment duties and confirmed the deadline to submit the Re-DOC.
      The Appellant failed to submit a Re-DOC by the deadline of 9 th January 2024 and the Respondent issued a compliance notice to the Appellant on 29 th January 2024. The compliance notice required the Appellant to complete and submit its Re-DOC by the extended deadline of 11 th March 2024. The compliance notice specified that a � 400 penalty fine may be imposed if the Appellant failed to comply.
      On 21 st February 2024, the Respondent unsuccessfully attempted to make telephone contact with the Appellant using the number held within its records. The record of the telephone call indicates that there was no answer and no option to leave a voicemail.
      The Appellant did not complete its Re-DOC by the extended deadline of 11 th March 2024 and the Respondent issued a fixed penalty notice to the Appellant on 27 th March 2024. The fixed penalty notice required a penalty payment of � 400 and compliance with the compliance notice, no later than 24 th April 2024.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.