Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Judge Hindson has done nothing to answer the questions which I have outlined above and has, instead, sought to fall back on Article 8 ECHR and to use it (as the grounds accurately describe) as a "general dispensing power." It is difficult to see how the fundamental human right which Article 8 is intended to protect may be infringed by the Entry Clearance Officer's decision. In the circumstances, I set aside the judge's decision and remade the decision. The appellant's appeal against the ECO's refusal dated 1 October 2014 is dismissed.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal which was promulgated on 11 May 2015 is set aside. I have remade the decision. The appellant's appeal against the Entry Clearance Officer's refusal of 1 October 2014 is dismissed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.