Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS SIR ANTHONY CLARKE LORD JUSTICE BROOKE (Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division) LORD JUSTICE BUXTON ____________________
(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR C E MOLL (instructed by Hackman, Middlesex) appeared on behalf of the Applicant MR S KOVATS (instructed by Treasury Solicitor, London) appeared on behalf of the Defendant ____________________
In paragraph 31 the adjudicator dealt with the applicant's medical history, and concluded, to put it shortly, that there was no distinctive psychiatric illness or other such reason to engage Article 8. She then continued in paragraph 32:
The adjudicator therefore found that removal of the appellant to Sri Lanka would be a breach of Article 8 rights; and, given the appellant's circumstances, it would be disproportionate.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.